Because of this relationship, it is often said that when a grating is used at the blaze condition, the facets act as tiny mirrors. This is not strictly true; since the dimensions of the facet are often on the order of the wavelength itself, ray optics does not provide an adequate physical model. Nonetheless, this is a useful way to remember the conditions under which a grating can be used to enhance efficiency.
Eq. (2-30) generally leads to the highest efficiency when the following condition is also satisfied:
2K = α – β = 0 (2-32)
where 2K was defined above as the angle between the incident and diffracted beams (see Eq. (2-6)). Eqs. (2-30) and (2-32) collectively define the Littrow blaze condition. When Eq. (2-32) is not satisfied (i.e., α≠β and therefore the grating is not used in the Littrow configuration), efficiency is generally seen to decrease as one moves further off Littrow (i.e., as |2K| increases).
For a given blaze angle θB, the Littrow blaze condition provides the blaze wavelength λB, the wavelength for which the efficiency is maximal when the grating is used in the Littrow configuration:
λB = 2d/m sinθB, in Littrow (2-33)
Many grating catalogs specify the first-order Littrow blaze wavelength for each grating:
λB = 2d sinθB, in Littrow (m = 1) (2-34)
Unless a diffraction order is specified, quoted values of λB are generally assumed to be for the first diffraction order, in Littrow.
The blaze wavelength λB in order m will decrease as the off-Littrow angle α–θB ncreases from zero, according to the relation
λB =2d/m sinθBcos(α–θB) (2-35)
Computer programs are commercially available that accurately predict grating efficiency for a wide variety of groove profiles over wide spectral ranges.