While spherical lenses do induce aberrations, choosing the proper lens shape can help minimize optical aberrations (see Figure 4). For instance,
plano-convex lenses, where only one side is curved, are the best choice for focusing parallel rays of light to a single point.
Bi-convex lenses (both sides have curvature that may not be equal to one another) are the best choice for imaging when the object and image are at similar distances from the lens. When a single spherical lens may be unsuitable due to spherical aberration,
aspheric lenses may be used. These lenses have surfaces with tailored curvatures that help minimize the impact of aberrations but are typically expensive due to the complexities associated with fabrication. Alternatively, multiple spherical lenses can be used where one lens can cancel the aberration caused by another, as shown in Figure 4. In addition to correcting for monochromatic aberrations, an achromatic doublet can be used to minimize chromatic aberrations by choosing the dispersion of the materials in the two lenses to produce a focal length that is independent of wavelength.
Microscope objectives are multi-element lens systems that can significantly reduce the impacts of aberrations but are more expensive due to the complexity of the design. All the aforementioned lenses are rotationally symmetric, that is, light focuses the same regardless of which transverse axis it passes through. On the other hand,
cylindrical lenses focus or expand light in one axis only and so are ideal for modifying an asymmetric beam like the output of a laser diode into a symmetric one. There are many features to take into consideration when choosing a
lens, including focal length, lens shape, F/#, lens material, transmission properties, wavefront distortion, scattered light, types of coating, and cost.